Shop More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
November 11, 2012
Image Size
1.9 KB
Resolution
101×57
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
571 (1 today)
Favourites
30 (who?)
Comments
45
Downloads
2
×
He wasn't by logic and other shit by Ellen-the-Liepard He wasn't by logic and other shit by Ellen-the-Liepard
[link]

A ancient war...beaten by simple Science
[EDIT2] Apparently a church changed Roman celebration of the sun to XMas. Apparently "Why make a new holiday when you can replace another holiday?" [/]

What gives it away is the fact that, when he was born, there was "Shepard's" and "Lambs". Lambs are born in Spring, not Winter. They would be sheep XMas, or, at least, dead.
[EDIT] Ok, he apparently was born in Modern day israel. However, my question about his skin still stands. [/]
Also my mind gets fucked when I try to understand why Mary is still a virgin and have a child
MOAR:
Why do some Christians say Jew's killed their lord? I thought he was the king of jews o3o
Also how is he white? One thought that part of the world was a bit hot...He would of, at least, been tanned.

Slice his throat with a rusty cleaver
Slice his throat with a rusty cleaver
Slice his throat with a rusty cleaver
Early in the morning~
The drunken Whaler (Dishonored remake of Drunken sailor)

Don't get me wrong, I dont care if you have a religion. But I am an Atheist that celebrates Christmas. I'm not a true Atheist? I am. Cuz he wasn't born on Christmas
Add a Comment:
 
:iconpaulthored:
Paulthored Featured By Owner Jun 18, 2014
Well Duh! Whatever gave you the idea he was born then?? from what I understand its merely the date on which we commemorate/celebrate his birth. kinda of like how an abandoned orphan might randomly pick a date to celebrate Their birthday. from what I know about the reasons behind the date, It was easier to give pagans a Christian Holiday to celebrate in order give the local priest's an easier time looking the other way when they obsereved their Soltice observations.

Still doesn't make it right to bash christians/christmas just because your religious belief differ from ours.

;peace:
Reply
:iconellen-the-liepard:
Ellen-the-Liepard Featured By Owner Jun 19, 2014  Student Digital Artist
"Still doesn't make it right to bash christians/christmas just because your religious belief differ from ours."
Explaining how he wasn't born on a certain day= Bashing now?
Lawl


Reply
:iconpaulthored:
Paulthored Featured By Owner Jun 19, 2014
did you read the rest of his artist description? that's how.

If it weren't for the tone that description gives this stamp, I might've :+fav: it.
Reply
:iconellen-the-liepard:
Ellen-the-Liepard Featured By Owner Jun 19, 2014  Student Digital Artist
I'm a she.

There is no tone; you literally dont like it because it's "bashing" your religion even though it's a stamp about your savoir's life.
Or is it because I'm an atheist/satanist? 
Reply
:iconpaulthored:
Paulthored Featured By Owner Jun 23, 2014
Uh, are you retarded or something.
you just told me I didn't like it because of its tone after telling me there is no tone.
doubly stupid is how you seem to think an opinion piece doesn't have a tone, or that 'bashing' isn't a tone.
-----
I don't know if you are an "atheist/satanist", & I don't know why you think this matters when I'm only discussing your stamp/artist description- of said stamp.
----
Apologies about the gender thing. its a few days ago, but I like to think I was typing 'this' instead of 'his' and the 't' didn't take, but I can understand if it was offensive to be mistaken like that. sorry. :peace:
----
as to the scratched out bit above, that was my initial reaction to you claiming there is no tone. it is basically my way of pointing out how absurd it is to claim there is no tone, and how even more absurd it is to then run with the claim that 'Bashing' someone or something isn't something that qualifies as a 'tone'. If it bothers you that much, that I won't :+fav: this stamp because of the tone of the artist description, that's not my problem. deal with it in a mature manner and you might come out of this with your dignity intact. Otherwise you could just decide to block me, despite how it would make you look. it's your call. :peace:

~:peace:~
Reply
:iconellen-the-liepard:
Ellen-the-Liepard Featured By Owner Jun 23, 2014  Student Digital Artist
Oh god this comment makes me giggle.

 Uh, are you retarded or something. 
No; you act like it though.

 you just told me I didn't like it because of its tone after telling me there is no tone. 
There is no tone. 

 doubly stupid is how you seem to think an opinion piece doesn't have a tone, or that 'bashing' isn't a tone.
They dont unless you shout them. I wasn't going in ALL CAPS AND SHOUTING THEM OUT LIKE SOME RETARD CHILD WHO FAILED THEIR ENGLISH CLASS.

 I don't know if you are an "atheist/satanist", & I don't know why you think this matters when I'm only discussing your stamp/artist description- of said stamp.
Heard of Joking?

 Apologies about the gender thing. its a few days ago, but I like to think I was typing 'this' instead of 'his' and the 't' didn't take, but I can understand if it was offensive to be mistaken like that. sorry. 
Felt like informing.

 as to the scratched out bit above, that was my initial reaction to you claiming there is no tone. it is basically my way of pointing out how absurd it is to claim there is no tone, and how even more absurd it is to then run with the claim that 'Bashing' someone or something isn't something that qualifies as a 'tone'. 
There literally is no tone; coming from the person who made the stamp.

 
 If it bothers you that much, that I won't +fav this stamp because of the tone of the artist description, that's not my problem. deal with it in a mature manner and you might come out of this with your dignity intact
I literally responded to you because of your pathetic claim of "It has a bad tone" when there is no proof it does.

 
 Otherwise you could just decide to block me, despite how it would make you look. it's your call. 
I dont block people unless they're annoying; you are annoying but also amusing.
Reply
:iconpaulthored:
Paulthored Featured By Owner Jun 28, 2014
"They dont:bulletpurple: unless you shout them..."---- Wrong. There was nothing correct with the entirety of that statement. {:bulletpurple:also you missed ' in -don't-, miss failed English class :razz }
"There is no tone. "---Ditto the above.

"There literally is no tone; coming from the person who made the stamp."---Never claimed that the stamp by itself had a tone I disagreed with. But when paired with your artist description of said stamp... -{the stamp is like a parade. a parade in general is considered at least an okay thing, if not a good thing. But what if its a Nazi/KKK parade through a Jewish/African American town/community?? you think that Doesn't change the Tone???}---"I literally responded to you because of your pathetic claim of "It has a bad tone" when there is no proof it does."---uh, yeah I do. your entire artist description is proof enough.

"I dont:bulletpurple: block people unless they're annoying"--- somewhat the same, I generally don't block unless I'm blocked first, mainly because I had a gal block me once, and then/after they responded. so I couldn't respond.

:peace:
Reply
:iconellen-the-liepard:
Ellen-the-Liepard Featured By Owner Jun 28, 2014  Student Digital Artist
Omg I missed a ' it's such a life damaging thing I'm going to get shot by an invisable dickhead in the sky
THAT's a tone.
The description, however, doesn't have a tone.
Did you honestly start commenting just for nothing? If so then tell me, I dont want to waste time on you; you're not worth it.
Reply
:iconjell-o-emperor:
Jell-o-Emperor Featured By Owner Apr 5, 2014  Hobbyist Artist
Don't distinguish the foolishness of men for they'll continue to be fruitless in finding answers.
Reply
:iconcriminallynerdy:
CriminallyNerdy Featured By Owner Mar 27, 2014  Student Writer
Finally someone has said it! In fact, even as a religious person it's always bothered me how people assume he was born on Christmas when there was really no proof of that. In fact, the Bible never spoke of or specified Jesus' birthday at all, so it's crazy how up in arms people get about it. But a lot of researchers have been understanding that logically Jesus' birthday was most likely in Spring or Fall considering the passage of his birth implied animals were able to graze out in the fields.

And obviously no farmer, unless they were really sadistic, would make their animals graze out in the cold. But I think it's mostly a case of a lot of people ignoring that detail in the passage that makes believe that Jesus' birthday being December is true, when in actuality a person who does enough research knows that the idea of Jesus' birthday being in December originated when Pagan beliefs were merged with Christian beliefs. In fact, Horus, the anti-christ god figure was the one who was born in December which is a little known fact so far.
Reply
Add a Comment: